Fin from the Stone Age, the poitica youth organizations of political parties was a parody of one of the greats. So, when a twenty-four radical politics grew by Marco Cappato was a candidate in the primaries already booked by a couple of young democrats of proven faith, we could write that the parody of the clash between the grandchildren of D'Alema, Veltroni and Rutelli also added the great-grandson of panels. In fact, the pattern of young radicals entrista mirrors that already tried two summers ago by the founder, when he tried in vain to slip in the primary Pannella adult then won by Veltroni. Giulia Innocenzi has had more luck and now seems to have the credentials to dispute the leadership small as quoted Fausto Raciti, and other candidates, Dario and Marini youth delegate Rosy Bindi, Salvatore Bruno.
If these lines there is a light tone is just because young people need to know that the parody is just a literary genre one step before the farce can be taken with a little 'spirit, attitude does not always feel that those who attend or touching them. That said, the story is rather very serious, because involvement sincere passion, and because it seems to us to see if there will be a decisive Pd Pd after this, and will be. Just
radicals and their blonde luissina candidate come in handy as the litmus test. A little
'innate dislike for a little' for the sake of rules, some 'rational aversion to politics, many adults consider serious incursion of Pd drone Cappato and demand respect for the rule that should have taken off the primary youth who did not grow in the backyard. Nothing against
Innocenzi, very radical against the habit of wanting to put (a lot of the story of the elections has not gone down). Some people say 'are entering the Democratic Party without declaring it and paying the duty, and some say the contrary, that since there are entering the Pd (that is, keep your system intact) should not try to influence the internal life. Apart from assessing usually proceeds as in the concrete experience alliance, in Parliament and many local governments see democratic and radical steps of understanding. The point I would like to raise is, however, that these important considerations in judging the alliance between adults - should be abandoned when the word passes to future generations the Democratic Party. Be careful, because now we speak of free radicals but this is valid for the Young Socialists, Catholics, liberals, and especially for the great mass of those born to politics in the era of the Olive (not necessarily nell'Ulivo) and outside the traditional political experience . We should let the boys do what is impossible to ask the adults to stand up and work hard to bring to life a party Democratic virgin, powered by their experience and not forced in the diagrams of the previous membership.
We explain that it is utopia, or ingenuity, because each of these twenty-second team leader responds to a logic of co-optation. We suspect that's true, though parody. But if anything, these guys are going to turn schools and districts asking for votes and consensus, they will discover that it is not in the name of that team leader who would conquer them. Easier to spend his face, and a critical mass with a horizontal generational pact. If Innocenzi Pannella succeeds where he failed, because the universe is young does not include an exclusion which instead appeared perfectly understandable (you can share it or less) against the elephant of Italian politics who is the leader, radical. Apply the same method to the dialectic between D'Alema and Veltroni's grandchildren, and magically you will see the chalk boulders that make life so stuck inside the Democratic Party, and far from the reality of the country.
Stefano Minichini
0 comments:
Post a Comment